Theory of recollection

The second one ibidem states that soul is immortal and cannot be annihilated. It transmigrates from a body to another when the first dies, after staying sometimes in the Hades, though it forgets —but does not lose- everything it knew in the process.

Theory of recollection

Chariot Allegory Along with these other allegories, Plato's charioteer myth Phaedrus cb certainly also deserves mention. The ascent of the mind to celestial and trans-celestial realms is likened to a charioteer and a chariot drawn by two winged horses, one dark and one white.

Figuratively represented is the famous Platonic tripartite model of the soul: Only by taming and controlling the two horses can the charioteer ascend to the heavens and enjoy a banquet of divine knowledge.

SparkNotes: Phaedo: 72e - 78b

Key epistemological features of the charioteer myth are 1 an emphasis, as with the cave allegory, upon true knowledge as ascent, 2 and the need to tame one's passionate nature to obtain true knowledge.

In Symposium abPlato's Socrates cites the priestess Diotima as defining a "lover" as someone who loves and love as a desire for something that one does not have.

According to this ladder model of love, a lover progresses from rung to rung from the basest love to the pure form of love as follows: A beautiful body - The lover begins here at the most obvious form of love. Beautiful souls - After most likely attempting to have every beautiful body, the lover should realize that if a single love does not satisfy, there is no reason to think that many ones will satisfy.

Thus, the "lover of every body" must, in the words of Plato, "bring his passion for the one into due proportion by deeming it of little or of no importance.

The beauty of laws and institutions - The next logical step is for the lover to love all beautiful souls and then to transfer that love to that which is responsible for their existence: The beauty of knowledge - Once proceeding down this path, the lover will naturally long for that which produces and makes intelligible good social institutions: Beauty itself - This is the platonic "form" of beauty itself.

It is not a particular thing that is beautiful, but is instead the essence of beauty. Plato describes this level of love as a "wondrous vision," an "everlasting loveliness which neither comes nor ages, which neither flowers nor fades.

Such steps follow the same pattern as Plato's metaphor of the sun, his allegory of the cave and his divided line; progress brings one closer and closer to reality as each step explains the relative reality of the past. On the theory of recollection in Plato's Phaedo 73cThe Theory of Recollection consists in an epistemological thesis and an ontological thesis.

The epistemological thesis is a form of rationalism. According to the thesis, some knowledge is an essential part of "reason" and the soul. Plato's theory which postulates that all knowledge that has ever been known and will ever be known is already preexistent in your memory; thus time is an illusion, merely the unfolding process of remembering everything.

Theory of recollection

Such a recollection is known as anamnesia. This . Plato's Recollection Argument in the Phaedo Part 1. Ok, so I might come back & edit these because this is an ongoing extended essay that I have to write & I’m not sure how this blog is going to work. The Platonic doctrine of recollection or anamnesis, is the idea that we are born possessing all knowledge and our realization of that knowledge is contingent on our discovery of it.

Whether the doctrine should be taken literally or not is a subject of debate.

Theory of recollection

This disproves the recollection theory because if the soul can not learn, it also can not have the ability to recollect what it does know. A question that arises in my mind is when comparing the disavowal of knowledge and the theory or recollection. Socrates‟ theory of Recollection is a byproduct of the Socratic Paradox of Inquiry, which is based on the following syllogism: If one knows, inquiry of the known is unnecessary, If one does not know, inquiry of the unknown is impossible, Therefore, inquiry is either unnecessary or impossible.

[BINGSNIPMIX-3
Anamnesis (philosophy) - Wikipedia